He will find his way and he can accept, amend or reject what I offered. So, mind your own settings and let others get back to answering the OP's question like I tried in the way I had available.
Consequently, I avoided going down that road from the start. I just preferred to not have problems with rf getting into the equipment that wasn't made for amateur use like soooooo many of the Behringer-likers have found and fought. The bottom line is that the Behringer stuff wasn't for me, but it may be for you and that's okay. Use what you want and work with what you use." They're also commonly "Heil-haters" and they seem to like to call that stuff out in favor of other brands. There's a segment that likes to put all that Behringer audio equipment in line, like de-essers, processors, parametric equalizers, etc.
It all has to do with the environment, equipment, and the voice using it. So, I know how it sounds and it's not over-boomy like too many of the "audio-amending" crowd tend to do with their settings. 3.0, etc) and then acting to accommodate such receivers. It worked for me, especially seeing how adjusting the receiving bandpass changed the sound (i.e, 2.4 vs. Use them at the start to get see the RELATIVE changes, but then record the audio through another decent receiver and make the final changes. The bottom line is to ultimately NOT depend on the sound from the components nor the monitor function on the radio. It's good advice and a good way to start. I've done exactly what you describe when I started setting things - plugging into each component as I worked through it - along with receiving recommendations from Julias (W2IHY) and then working from there. When that happens, I'd rather just have a flat response from the start to make things easier. It's already locked in stone, so an eq will be needed under those conditions.
However, a problem arises when they may not emphasize the range needed in one situation or have enough emphasis needed by another person. It's great if it's being used directly into the radio. Other mics, often older designs, were engineered with a response curve to emphasize certain ranges. It was designed that way with the intention of using it with an eq. Why are they set as shown? Because the mic's response is flat and I know he sound.
W2ihy equalizer ic 7800 manual#
Once this setting is made, don't drive the radio with any more out board equipment gain level because it's you drive reference into the radio.Īll the above is in the user manual hear and there through out.Ĭlick to expand.You must mean shudder. Set the radio mike gain without the equipment so you just see a little ALC action. If you do that, your fighting to correct it with outboard EQ that should not have to be done.ĭon't dial in excessive low end ,and watch the Limiter light levels as explained in the user manual. I can tell this without reservation that the radio EQ needs to be level and not set to favor high or low end or some other curve. Once you get it good, the approval will come unsolicited. It has to sound good at these points before it will be any good on the air.
W2ihy equalizer ic 7800 plus#
you want to set up audio the way you want to hear it not for others approval.ĭo the setup using a good pair of head phones, first in the EQ Plus monitor, then in the radio monitor. You need to first read the user manual to become familiar with the sections do, otherwise you just become a knob turner and go on the air and ask how's my audio. The EQ Plus only has Bass and Treble two band tilting. The frequency response of the mike in uses determines the EQ setting as well as your voice. You cannot go by some one else's setting. I have been in audio processing almost 3 years.
0 kommentar(er)
